PaedCare KGH Research Suite · AMC/KGH Visakhapatnam

SNAPPE-II Score

Neonatal Illness Severity + Audit + Research Framework

v5.1 · De-identified Research Platform · Jun 2025 · Max 162
L1 CLINICAL L2 TIME ENGINE L3 REGISTRY L4 OUTCOMES L5 DASHBOARD L6 VALIDATION L7 EXPORTS L8 PUB PREP L9 GOVERNANCE
⚠ Clinical Safety Notice — Read Before Use
👶 Patient & Assessment Details
🕐
🆔 Report ID:
SNAPPE-II Score
0 / 162
Incomplete
⚠ Select all 9 items for a valid score.
Item Completeness 0 / 9 selected
MAP
Temp
PF
pH
Sz
UO
BWT
SGA
APG5
📊 SNAP-II Variables (worst values in first 12 hours)
1
Mean Blood Pressure (MAP)
Worst MAP in first 12 hrs (mmHg)
≥ 30 mmHgNormal range
0
20–29 mmHgModerate hypotension
9
< 20 mmHgSevere hypotension
19
2
Temperature (Lowest)
Lowest recorded temp in first 12 hrs (°C) — 3 tiers per Richardson 2001
> 35.6 °CNormothermia
0
35.0 – 35.6 °CMild hypothermia
8
< 35.0 °CSignificant hypothermia
15
3
PO₂ / FiO₂ Ratio
Worst ratio in first 12 hrs — max 28 pts if <0.30
> 2.49Adequate oxygenation
0
1.00 – 2.49Mild–moderate hypoxia
5
0.30 – 0.99Severe hypoxia
16
< 0.30Critical hypoxia — 28 pts (NOT 16)
28
4
Serum pH
Lowest pH in first 12 hrs (from ABG)
≥ 7.20Normal-mild acidosis
0
7.10 – 7.19Moderate acidosis
7
< 7.10Severe acidosis
16
5
Seizures
Multiple seizures in first 12 hrs
None or single seizure
0
Multiple seizures≥2 episodes in 12 hrs
19
6
Urine Output
Average ml/kg/hr over first 12 hrs
≥ 1.0 ml/kg/hrAdequate
0
0.1 – 0.9 ml/kg/hrOliguria
5
< 0.1 ml/kg/hrAnuria
18
🍼 Perinatal Extension (PE) — 3 Separate Items
7
Birth Weight
PE Item — 3 tiers per Richardson 2001 · scored separately from SGA
≥ 1000 gNot ELBW
0
750 – 999 gVery low birth weight
10
< 750 gExtremely low birth weight
17
8
Small for Gestational Age (SGA)
PE Item — 12 pts · <10th centile for GA · Independent of item 7
Not SGAWeight ≥ 10th centile for gestational age (Fenton 2013 / WHO chart)
0
SGA — weight < 10th centile for GAFenton 2013 for preterm; WHO 2006 for term. Both = 12 pts.
12
9
APGAR at 5 Minutes
PE Item — from delivery record · cutoff <7 per Richardson 2001
APGAR ≥ 7Normal vigour at 5 minutes
0
APGAR < 7 (i.e. 0–6)Depressed at 5 minutes
18
SNAPPE-II — Neonatal Illness Severity Score
/ 162
🆔 Study ID (de-identified)
GA
Birth Weight
Sex
Diagnosis
Resp. Support
Inotropes
ABG Source
🍼 Age at Assessment
Assessment
Date & Time
🔒 This report is de-identified (study-mode only). No patient name, mother's name, admission number, ward, or clinician identifiers are displayed. Bedside identifiers remain in the input form only and are never shown in any report, export, or dashboard.
📋 Item-wise Score Breakdown (Value → Points)
1. Mean BP (MAP)
2. Temperature
3. PO₂/FiO₂ Ratio
4. Serum pH
5. Seizures
6. Urine Output
7. Birth Weight (PE)
8. SGA (PE)
9. APGAR at 5 min (PE)
TOTAL SNAPPE-II
Completeness
📊 SCORE COMPOSITION
SNAP-II Physiologic Score— / 115
Perinatal Extension Score— / 47
SNAPPE-II Total— / 162
AMC/KGH Internal Validation Version. For neonatal severity benchmarking, audit support, and education. Manual verification against the original SNAPPE-II scoring system is recommended. Not yet validated against AMC/KGH outcome data. Ref: Richardson DK et al., Pediatrics 2001;108(4):909–916.
BENCHMARKING TOOL ONLY. ① Not an individual prediction. ② Not a treatment-decision tool. ③ Do not use to deny, limit or withdraw care. ④ Clinical judgment supersedes score. Observed mortality values are from the original SNAPPE-II validation cohort only (Richardson DK et al., 2001, n=1,595). ⚠ These mortality figures do not represent current AMC/KGH outcomes.
⚠ WhatsApp / Copy / Print are disabled until this assessment is Saved — a Study ID must exist before any report can be shared.

📸 Screenshot the card above to save as image.

📊 SNAPPE-II Observed Mortality — Richardson et al., Pediatrics 2001
Score BandObserved MortalityRisk Category
0 – 90.3%Very Low
10 – 191.6%Low
20 – 293.8%Low-Moderate
30 – 397.4%Moderate
40 – 4915.7%High
50 – 5922.1%High
60 – 6932.6%Very High
70 – 7938.7%Very High
≥ 8066.7%Extreme
⚠ Population-level benchmarking data only. Not an individual prediction. Do not use to deny, limit or withdraw care. Clinical judgment supersedes score.
📋 Scoring Notes: SNAP-II max = 115 (MAP 19 + Temp 15 + PF 28 + pH 16 + Seizures 19 + UO 18). PE max = 47 (APGAR5 18 + BWT 17 + SGA 12). SNAPPE-II total max = 162.
🔬 SNAP-II vs SNAPPE-II: If perinatal data unavailable, document as SNAP-II only (max 115). An incomplete score must not be used for benchmarking.
📁 Layer 2 — Audit Registry: Tap "Save to Audit" after scoring to add this record to the longitudinal audit registry. Records are stored privately on this device only. Switch to the Audit tab to view, update outcomes, and export.
📋 NICU Research Registry — L3
0
Total
0
Complete
0
Outcomes
0
Pending
💾 Data stored locally on this device. No patient data is transmitted. Use CSV export in the Research tab for analysis. Recommended: export CSV monthly for backup and research.
🎯 Outcome Tracking Module — L4
🎯 Why outcomes matter: Linking SNAPPE-II scores to actual outcomes (survival, death, LAMA, transfer) creates the dataset for local validation — the first step toward a KGH-specific mortality prediction model. Even 50 paired records create publishable data.
📊 Research Analytics Dashboard — L5
📊
No data yet
Save at least 1 assessment to see analytics.
📤 Research Exports — Standard Dataset

Export the full audit dataset for analysis. All exports are from data saved on this device. No data is sent to any server. (See also the dedicated Exports tab.)

Audit CSV contains identified patient data — internal audit use only. Do not share externally. Use Research CSV/JSON (De-id) for sharing with statisticians or co-investigators.
📚 Publication Potential — AMC/KGH SNAPPE-II Research
🏆 Primary Research Questions (Cross-Sectional)
SNAPPE-II score distribution among NICU admissions at a tertiary government teaching hospital in South India
Prevalence of high-severity illness (SNAPPE-II ≥ 40) in resource-limited NICU settings
Profile of illness severity by diagnosis category: RDS vs HIE vs Sepsis
Contribution of perinatal factors (SGA, ELBW, low APGAR) to SNAPPE-II score in a government NICU
🔬 Cohort Studies (Requires Outcome Data — Layer 3)
Relationship between SNAPPE-II score at admission and NICU mortality — local validation study
SNAPPE-II vs CRIB-II: comparative validity for mortality prediction in Indian NICU populations
SNAPPE-II score as a predictor of ventilator requirement and CPAP failure
Does SNAPPE-II predict LAMA (left against medical advice) in resource-constrained settings?
📈 Quality Improvement Projects
Audit of SNAPPE-II completeness: feasibility of systematic scoring in a busy government NICU
Tracking mean SNAPPE-II trends as a NICU quality indicator over time
Effect of kangaroo mother care and hypothermia bundle on temperature sub-score trends
🌍 Health Systems Research (LMIC-Specific)
SNAPPE-II feasibility in ABG-limited settings: can SNAP-II (without PE) still predict outcome?
Missing data patterns in SNAPPE-II: implications for scoring in resource-limited NICUs
Benchmarking AMC/KGH NICU severity profile against published Indian NICU cohorts
📋 Target Journals: Indian Pediatrics · Journal of Tropical Pediatrics · Indian Journal of Pediatrics · Acta Paediatrica · Archives of Disease in Childhood — Fetal & Neonatal · BMJ Open · PLOS ONE (for LMIC validation studies)

⚖ SNAPPE-II vs CRIB-II — Comparative Framework

Both tools benchmark NICU severity. Understanding their differences is the first step toward the comparative validity study publishable from AMC/KGH data.

FeatureSNAPPE-IICRIB-II
Full name Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology — Perinatal Extension II Clinical Risk Index for Babies II
Reference Richardson DK et al., Pediatrics 2001 Parry G et al., Lancet 2003
Max score 162 (SNAP-II 115 + PE 47) 27
No. of variables 9 (6 physiologic + 3 perinatal) 5 (GA, BWT, sex, congenital anomaly, base excess)
ABG required? Yes (pH item; SNAP-II possible without) Yes (base excess)
Assessment window First 12 hours First 12 hours
Validated in India? Limited; needs local validation Limited; needs local validation
LMIC feasibility Moderate — ABG, UO, BP monitoring needed High — GA, BWT, sex, congenital anomaly, 1 ABG
Includes SGA/BWT? Yes — explicit PE items Yes — BWT is a core variable
Seizures captured? Yes — 19 pts for multiple seizures No
Urine output captured? Yes — 0 / 5 / 18 pts No
Temperature captured? Yes — 0 / 8 / 15 pts No
Congenital anomaly Not a standalone item Yes — binary yes/no item
Primary outcome NICU mortality risk stratification NICU mortality risk stratification
Research advantage Multi-domain physiology + perinatal context; richer dataset for QI Very simple; can be calculated without ICU monitoring
🔬 Proposed Comparative Study Design — AMC/KGH
Title: Comparative validity of SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II for predicting neonatal mortality in a government teaching hospital NICU in South India — a prospective cohort study

Setting: NICU, King George Hospital / Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam
Design: Prospective cohort, consecutive NICU admissions
Sample: n ≥ 100 (80% power, α=0.05, expected mortality ~15–20%)
Primary outcome: NICU mortality (death before discharge)
Secondary: Ventilator requirement, CPAP failure, LAMA, transfer
Analysis: AUROC for SNAPPE-II vs CRIB-II; calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow); DeLong test for AUROC comparison
Target journal: Indian Pediatrics / Journal of Tropical Pediatrics / BMJ Open

Data collection: Both scores calculable from same admission data. Both apps (SNAPPE-II + CRIB-II) needed. Export CSVs from each → merge by Admission No. → SPSS/R analysis.
CRIB-II app needed: To implement the full comparative study, a CRIB-II scoring app should be built in the PaedCare KGH suite. The comparison CSV export in the Research tab generates a template linking both scores per patient.
🔬 Local Validation vs Richardson 2001 — L6
🔬
Insufficient data
Requires ≥10 complete records with outcomes.
📐 Validation Roadmap — What is Needed
Step 1 — Calibration (≥30 outcome records): O/E ratio per band. O/E <1 = better than predicted.
Step 2 — AUROC (≥50 records, ≥10 deaths): AUROC ≥0.80 = good discrimination. Requires SPSS/R.
Step 3 — Hosmer-Lemeshow: Formal goodness-of-fit. Non-significant p = good calibration.
Step 4 — SNAPPE-II vs CRIB-II: DeLong test. Needs paired data from both apps.
Minimum for meaningful validation: n ≥ 100 outcome records, ≥15 deaths.
Validation ethics: Prospective outcome data collection for research validation requires IEC approval. Enter your IEC reference in the Governance tab.
📤 Research Exports — L7 · Data Governance
IDENTIFIED DATA: Audit CSV contains baby/mother names, AdmNo, clinician names. Internal audit only. Do NOT share externally.
DE-IDENTIFIED: Research CSV removes all identifiers. Only complete records. Safe for statisticians.
📋 Workflow: Audit CSV = internal records. Research CSV/JSON = statistical analysis. Export monthly for backup. IEC reference stamps all exports (set in Governance tab).
Manual verification required (de-id checklist Step 13): After exporting a Research CSV or JSON, open the actual downloaded file once and visually confirm no baby name, mother's name, admission number, ward, or clinician name is present. The automated self-test (deidSelfTest() in the browser console) checks the stripping logic with synthetic test data — it is not a substitute for inspecting this app's real exported file.
🛡 Data Governance — L9
Monthly Export Reminder: localStorage is volatile (clears if browser/app data is wiped). Export Audit CSV monthly for backup. Use Exports tab.
App Versionv5.1
Database Versionpaedcare_snappe2_v5
Study ID PrefixSNAPPEKGH
Total Records
Complete Records
Records with Outcome
First Record Date
Latest Record Date
Est. Storage Used
Network CallsNone · Zero transmission
Data LocationlocalStorage · Device only
IEC Clearance Ref.
IEC Approval Date
🔒 De-identification — PaedCare KGH Universal Module v1.0
Study ID Generated AtSave only — never on Report
PI-Only Linkage Table
Linkage Table in Exports?Never — excluded by design
⚠ This lookup is for PI use only at the bedside/registry. It is never used by any export or dashboard function.
📋 Ethics: IEC reference entered above stamps all research exports. Prospective outcome data collection for publication requires IEC approval per ICMR 2017 guidelines. Confirm with your IEC before initiating the research phase.